We care passionately about every customer we help
Linda Jones
Partner and Head of Family Law, Rugby
We care passionately about every customer we help
Linda Jones
Partner and Head of Family Law, Rugby
We pride ourselves on our close working relationships with our corporate customers
Alison McCormack
Partner and CEO
I was interested to see on the front page of The Times recently that they are calling for an end to “unjust” and “outdated” divorce laws, and have started a campaign to modernise family law.
One of the calls by The Times has been for an abolition of the need to blame the other party for the breakdown. At present this can only be done after a period of 2 years separation, and on the basis that the other spouse will consent. Given the average divorce can take between 6-12 months, this means it can take over 3 years after separation before the parties are divorced, and can have a legally binding agreement. Parties can of course divorce earlier, but often raising allegations of adultery or unreasonable behaviour can have a knock on impact on the often strained relationship between the parties. I therefore fully support the need for a ‘no fault’ divorce that doesn't’t require a 2 year waiting period. If you can get married because you love someone, why can you not end the marriage because you no longer love them?
The Times are also seeking backing for pre-nuptial agreements. Whilst I support greater recognition for these, there needs to be some element of check on the agreement. A divorcing couple should have their financial agreement formalised in a Consent Order, which the Court must consider before it is binding. This process involves the Court checking if the agreement is fair. The Court are not just there to rubber-stamp an agreement. There is no suggestion that such a check would be available for pre-nuptial agreements, which could leave one person financially worse off. Therefore whilst I agree there should be greater recognition for pre-nuptial agreements, I believe they should have a similar process available for the terms to be checked by the Court.
The Times are also seeking an end to so-called ‘meal ticket for life’ maintenance Orders. These are joint lives maintenance Orders, I will discuss this in my next blog.
In my opinion we do need changes to modernise Family Law, but The Times are not the first to call for these.
If you would like any advice on a pre-nuptial agreement, or are considering divorce proceedings, please do not hesitate to call on 01295 270999 or email me.
Clicking the Accept All button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies (check the full list). We use cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click Settings.
Our use of cookies.
You can learn more detailed information in our Privacy Policy
Some cookies are essential, whilst others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. The technology to maintain this privacy management relies on cookie identifiers. Removing or resetting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.
Essential Cookies
These cookies enable core website functionality, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
Google Analytics cookies help us to understand your experience of the website and do not store any personal data. Click here for a full list of Google Analytics cookies used on this site.
Third-Party cookies are set by our partners and help us to improve your experience of the website. Click here for a full list of third-party plugins used on this site.
Search site
Call our office
Make an enquiry
Make An Enquiry
Comments